Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matthew Daniels v. Casey Cleaver, et al
as 19-35231
Defendant / Appellee:
CASEY CLEAVER, RHONDA GORE, STEPHEN COOK and others
Defendant:
TAMMY GREINER, C. CLEMENTS, COLLETTE PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW RYAN DANIELS
Shannon Randall v. Maxwell & Morgan PC, et al
as 18-16601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON K. RANDALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MAXWELL & MORGAN PC, an Arizona professional corporation, REBECCA EASTON and RYAN DANIEL EASTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Daniels v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00285
Defendant:
Cory Claus, Casey Cleaver, C. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Essex Monarch La Brea Apartments, LP v. Ryan Daniel et al
as 2:2017cv06894
Defendant:
Ryan Daniel and Does
Plaintiff:
Essex Monarch La Brea Apartments, LP
Randall v. Maxwell & Morgan PC et al
as 2:2017cv01474
Plaintiff:
Shannon K Randall
Defendant:
Maxwell & Morgan PC, Rebecca Easton and Ryan Daniel Easton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Villanueva et al v. Maxwell & Morgan PC et al
as 2:2017cv01203
Plaintiff:
Matthew Villanueva and Aristea Villanueva
Defendant:
Maxwell & Morgan PC, Michael J McGirr, Samantha McGirr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Masters v. Collins
as 2:2013cv01692
Respondent:
Charlotte Collins
Petitioner:
Ryan Daniel Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Masters v. Frayn et al
as 2:2013cv01512
Respondent:
Kimberly Frayn and U.S. Attorneys Offices
Petitioner:
Ryan Daniel Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel v. Aramark et al
as 4:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ryan Daniel
Defendant:
Aramark and Cascade County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
