Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 218
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01547
Defendant: ERIC BRENNEN, SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, MARK S. ZEMELMAN and others
Plaintiff: ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BAKER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv04995
Petitioner: BRANDON S. BAKER, SR.
Respondent: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alley v. Baker et al
as 1:2017cv00590
Plaintiff: Robert Alley
Defendant: S. Baker, K. McMillan and T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erdmann v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02225
Plaintiff: Hans E. Erdmann
Defendant: Insys Therapeutics, Inc. , Santosh J. Vetticaden and Darryl S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Currier v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01954
Plaintiff: Kayd Currier
Defendant: Insys Therapeutics, Inc. , Santosh J. Vetticaden and Darryl S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Garza v. Skinnier et al
as 7:2017cv00028
Plaintiff: Erasmo Martinez Garza
Defendant: K Skinnier, S Baker, A Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Prosperity Bank et al
as 5:2016cv01329
Plaintiff: Larry S Baker and Larry S Baker DDS Inc
Defendant: Prosperity Bank , Lee Michael Harrison, Shannon Winsor and others
Counter_claimant: Lee Michael Harrison
Counter_defendant: Lee Michael Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01226
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00510
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
In re: Baker
as 16-3131
Petitioner: In re: ABASI S. BAKER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?