Cases 1 - 10 of 67
TEAMER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00200
Petitioner:
KERRICK VAN TEAMER
Respondent:
RICKY S DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rindal v. Dixon et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Steven Rindal and Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Roman S Dixon, Steve Aust, Washington State Department of Health doing business as Chiropractic Quality Assurance Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dixon v. L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14654
Plaintiff:
Tyra S. Dixon
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rindal v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv01293
Plaintiff:
Steven Rindal
Defendant:
Roman S Dixon, Steve Aust, James A Winchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dixon v. Gebremedhin et al
as 7:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Queen S Dixon
Defendant:
Merhawi H Gebremedhin and Windy City National Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jacquelynne S. Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rindal v. Inslee et al
as 2:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Steve Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Wydell Dixon
as 22-3921
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WYDELL S. DIXON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
