Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The S&D Family Trust, u/a/d January 30, 2008 et al v. Spracklin et al
as 2:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
The S&D Family Trust, u/a/d January 30, 2008 and Denise Wilson
Defendant:
James (Scott) Spracklin, Internal Revenue Service, Mr. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
The S&D Family Trust, u/a/d January 30, 2008 et al v. Spracklin et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
The S&D Family Trust, u/a/d January 30, 2008 and Denise Wilson
Defendant:
James (Scott) Spracklin, Internal Revenue Service, Mr. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Orphanos et al v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11146
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Orphanos, George Orphanos, Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. dba Ulta Beauty and others
Defendant:
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. doing business as Ulta Beauty and L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. doing business as Pureology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
McBride v. Goforth et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Defendant:
Krystal Goforth, Krystal Goforth Tidwell, Alexus Tedford Goforth and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Claire McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
C.W. Allen, et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc., et al
as 15-10744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. W. ALLEN and S. D. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED and MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Kane Builders S&D, Inc. v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC
as 8:2012cv03775
Plaintiff:
Kane Builders S&D, Inc.
Defendant:
Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Liggon et al v. Bank of America Mortgage
as 1:2012cv00827
Plaintiff:
Stewart Liggon, Elizabeth Liggon and Minors S, D & K
Defendant:
Bank of America Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
