Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GLUNT v. 84 LUMBER et al
as 2:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH S. GLUNT
Defendant:
84 LUMBER and ATTORNEY CRAIG SNETHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Glunt v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2018cv00288
Defendant:
John Doe, Multnomah County and Michael Reese
Plaintiff:
James S. Glunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2013cv02428
Petitioner:
JEROME SMITH
Respondent:
STEVEN S. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEST v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2013cv00748
Petitioner:
DWIGHT WEST
Respondent:
STEVEN S. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Amicus - Appellee:
N. G. BARTLEY
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 11-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 10-4434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
GLUNT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52785
Plaintiff:
THOMAS S. GLUNT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ARTEAGA v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2010cv00161
Petitioner:
GILBERT ARTEAGA
Respondent:
S. GLUNT, D. HUNTER, ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
