Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Manuel S Jimenez and Evangeline Jimenez
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
James Boone v. Elda Oliveros, et al
as 20-16904
Defendant / Appellee:
S. JIMENEZ, Custody Officer, Correctional Training Facility, TANYA FLORES, Mail Room Staff, ELDA OLIVEROS, Mailroom Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES BOONE, AKA James Leshawn Boone
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 2:2019cv00246
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11946
Plaintiff:
George Kane, Charles Hyland, Christine Sandra Wilson and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Jimenez et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv11875
Plaintiff:
Susan Lori Magazine, Jem A Howard, Steven LaFrance and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Chris Langer v. Jose Jimenez et al
as 8:2017cv01430
Defendant:
Does, Jose Jimenez and Sandra S. Jimenez
Plaintiff:
Chris Langer
Jimenez v. Tampkins
as 3:2016cv01761
Petitioner:
Pablo S. Jimenez
Respondent:
Cynthia Y. Tampkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pablo S. Jimenez v. Superior Cout of California County of San Diego East Division
as 3:2015cv02719
Petitioner:
Pablo S. Jimenez
Respondent:
Superior Cout of California County of San Diego East Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
