Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Cohen v. Stryker Corporation, et al
as 10-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JILLIAN M. COHEN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Susan R. Lustgarten, for the benefit of herself and the beneficiaries of the Estate
Plaintiff:
STEWART J. LUSTGARTEN, JENNIFER S. KAHN and SHELBY L. TUTTY
Defendant - Appellee:
STRYKER CORP. and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cohen v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv11698
Plaintiff:
Jillian M Cohen, Stewart J. Lustgarten, Jennifer S. Kahn and others
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Corporation, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kahn et al v. Ran et al
as 2:2008cv14417
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Kahn and Kahn Family, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Gary Ran, TIM Real Estate Mezzanine Fund I, LLC, TIM Real Estate Mezzanine Advisors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
CBIZ ACCOUNTING, TAX & ADVISORY LLC v. ARC GROUP ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04862
Plaintiff:
CBIZ ACCOUNTING, TAX & ADVISORY LLC
Defendant:
ARC GROUP ASSOCIATES, INC., ERIC GREENBERG and LEONARD S. KAHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cohen et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv11575
Plaintiff:
Jillian M Cohen, Stewart J Lustgarten and Jennifer S Kahn
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Builders Mutual Insurance Company v. Kalman Construction Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00608
Plaintiff:
Builders Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kalman Construction Corporation, Kalman Construction Corporation, Kalman Construction Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Kalman Construction Corporation, Kalman Construction Corporation, Kalman Construction Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
Builders Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
