Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Brayan Martin Meza v. Dean Borders et al
as 2:2019cv10297
Defendant:
Dean Borders and S. Lopez Briseno
Plaintiff:
Brayan Martin Meza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. Pfeifer et al
as 2:2019cv01724
Plaintiff:
Taft L Hill
Defendant:
S Lopez, C. Pfeifer, K Cater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2019cv01221
Defendant:
K Cater, C. Pfeifer, B. Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Taft L Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon Ocon v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2019cv01629
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ocon
Defendant:
Officer E. Martinez, Does 1-10, inclusive, Officer G. Raya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon S. Lopez, Jr. v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Defendant:
Deputy Walter Kazee, County of San Bernardino, Deputy Taylor Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon S. Lopez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00482
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Leo S Lopez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Kevin Schrubb, Sr. v. A. Lopez, et al
as 18-15843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, Sr., AKA Kevin Ray Schrubb
Defendant - Appellee:
A. S. LOPEZ, M. BRYANT, R. SIMMONS and others
Renteria v. Matharu et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Plaintiff:
Luis Renteria
Defendant:
Kabir Matharu, Jeffery Wang, S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Rhoades et al
as 6:2018cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey James Sanders, K. Smith, J. Christian Haile and others
Defendant:
C. Rhoades, J. Kromholz, K.H.P. Bryk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Edgar Moreno
as 17-20739
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDGAR GALICIA MORENO, also known as Rolando Sanchez Martinez, also known as Jorge S. Lopez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
