Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Martin v. Owens et al
as 6:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Lisa J. Martin
Defendant:
Sue S. Owens and Charles T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Owens
Defendant:
Berk Artrip, Dentin Hite, Edward Boakye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Artrip et al
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Owens
Defendant:
Berk Artrip, Dentin Hite, Edward Boakye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, D. Rose, Brian Vanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Settles v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
Markelle D. Settles
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Crump Station G1B, Valerie D. Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09096
Plaintiff:
CHRIS S. OWENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07508
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAGNER, JOHNATHAN WAGNER, BOYD A. WALKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
