Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PRYOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94616
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD S PRYOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawyers United Inc., et al v. USA, et al
as 20-5269
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Smith, Judicial Circuit Judge, James M. Lorenz, District Judge, Mark Walker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evelyn Aimee DeJesus and Lawyers United Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Allan Wainwright
(PC) Reed v. Fox et al
as 2:2019cv00275
Defendant:
David M. Mathis, Hank Blank, San Joaquin General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Joseph Klug v. Warden, et al
as 16-17004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH EMIL KLUG
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF PROGRAMS, ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF OPERATIONS and others
PRYOR v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01765
Respondent:
DISCIPLINARY HEARING BOARD and SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
BRANDON S. PRYOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Fox et al
as 2:2014cv02705
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Defendant:
R. Fox, D. Cueva, S. Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRYOR v. BUTTS
as 1:2011cv01368
Respondent:
KETH BUTTS
Petitioner:
BRANDON S. PRYOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanton v. Bailey et al
as 4:2011cv02269
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
L. Bailey, D. McCully, M Edison III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
