Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cassie Crisano v. Anthony Hopkins
as 19-6994
Defendant / Appellee:
PENTAGON POLICE OFFICER ANTHONY JAMES HOPKINS and PENTAGON POLICE CHIEF KEEVIL S. RICHARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Crisano v. Pentagon Officer Anthony James Hopkins et al
as 1:2019cv00702
Defendant:
Pentagon Officer Anthony James Hopkins and Pentagon Police Chief Keevil S. Richard
Plaintiff:
Cassie C. Crisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27165
Plaintiff:
Lena S Richards
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins. v. Antonelli, Terry, et al
as 10-2404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP and DONALD E. STOUT, Esq.
Defendant:
ADRIENNE ANDROS FERGUSON, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, EMILY J. ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, JULIA LYNN ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS and others
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insur v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Krau
as 09-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP and DONALD E. STOUT, Esq.
Defendant - None:
ADRIENNE ANDROS FERGUSON, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, EMILY J. ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, JULIA LYNN ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS and others
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP et al
as 1:2008cv01020
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Donald E. Stout, Adrienne Andros Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
