Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05617
Plaintiff:
Hilbert Thomas
Defendant:
Oak Smith, S. Sanchez and J. Munger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jose S. Sanchez, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miles v. Clark County et al
as 2:2021cv00290
Defendant:
D Lorenza, NaphCare Inc., F Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Stephon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cozad v. Redwood City et al
as 3:2020cv08756
Defendant:
Sam Sanchez, Jose S. Sanchez, Diana Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Addison Cozad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohen Uhuru v. Chaplain Hadjaj, et al
as 20-55550
Defendant / Appellee:
M. LUKASIK, Psychologist Supervisor, O'DELL, CCI, Custody Case Worker/Counselor at ICC-UCC, S. SANCHEZ, Captain in Ad Seg at the RJD Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2020cv00832
Defendant:
Dos Gordos LLC, Juan Quezada, Linda S Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Uhuru v. Hadjaj et al
as 3:2019cv02343
Defendant:
M. Valakantjis, Captain Garza, Lt. B. Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Elmir S. Sanchez Lopez v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2019cv07502
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
ELMIR S. SANCHEZ LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
