Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Sample v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00281
Petitioner:
Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AL-KASSAR v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
as 2:2018cv00086
Defendant:
AMY ADAMS, BUREAU OF PRISONS, N. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL-KASSAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Al-Kassar v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
Monzer Al-Kassar
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, S. Julian, FNU Rigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
RUNYON v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2017cv00530
Defendant:
BRAZZELL, JOHN EDWARDS, FBI AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUNYON v. KRUEGER et al
as 1:2017cv04277
Defendant:
BRAZZELL, JOHN EDWARDS, FBI AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Regassa v. Sanders et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Admassu Regassa
Defendant:
K. Sanders, R. Baskerville, C. Krawczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Monster Energy Company v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2017cv06327
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Zhao Fei, Yu Da and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sample v. Superintendent
as 2:2017cv00040
Petitioner:
Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
