Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Samuel Myles v. Maya Santamaria, et al
as 21-1933
Plaintiff:
We Are Family Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Midwest Latino Entertainment & Talent and Maya Santamaria
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Myles et al v. Santamaria et al
as 0:2020cv02142
Plaintiff:
We Are Family Inc. and Samuel Haywood Myles
Defendant:
Midwest Latino Entertainment & Talent and Maya Santamaria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01862
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles, Samuel v. Gupta, Ravi et al
as 3:2014cv00661
Plaintiff:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Defendant:
Ravi Gupta and Unknown Name Medical Staff Pharmacist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myles, Samuel v. Werlinger, Robert
as 3:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Respondent:
Robert Werlinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Samuel Myle
as 12-3002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Myles, Samuel v. Getit et al
as 3:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Defendant:
Getit and A. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samuel Myles v. Chaplain Wallace
as 10-7213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL HAYWOOD MYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAPLAIN WALLACE, In his individual capacity and his official capacity, CHAPLAIN KOWALEZYK, In his individual capacity and his official capacity and CHAPLAIN ELLIOTT, In his individual capacity and his official capacity
United States v. Samuel Haywood Myles
as 09-3830
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Myles v. Wallace et al
as 2:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Samuel Haywood Myles
Defendant:
Wallace, Kowalezyk and Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
