Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Samuel Ross v. Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Administ, et al
as 22-2829
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ADMINISTRATOR, D. JUGLE, PROTHOTARY OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL RECORDS and C. FORTE, PROTHONOTARY OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL RECORDS OF PENNSYLVANIA
Rosse v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv02112
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Samuel Rosse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rosse v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv02113
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Samuel Rosse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Samuel Ross v. Clerk Court of Common Pleas
as 17-3719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ADMINISTRATOR, D. JUGLE, Prothonotary of the Office of Judicial Records and C. FORTE, Prothonotary of the Office of Judicial Records Pennsylvania
Samuel Ross v. Michael Atchison, et al
as 15-3036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. ATCHISON, Warden, Chief Administrative Officer, Menard Correctional Center, LIEUTENANT MITCHELL, Menard Correctional Center, TIM VEATH, Correctional Officer, Lieutenant Menard Correctional Center and others
Ross v. Atchison et al
as 3:2014cv00574
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ross
Defendant:
Michael P Atchison, Lt Mitchell, Timothy R Veath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Ross v. Gina Allen
as 13-1981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
GINA ALLEN, in her individual and official capacities
Ross v. Allen
as 1:2012cv01487
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ross
Defendant:
Gina Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ross v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2012cv00973
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ross
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
