Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06553
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sandoval v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv03679
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gerrold Raymond Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 26-7291
Defendant:
Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Plaintiff:
CARLOS LOPEZ SALAMANCA, DANIEL LIZARRAGA, DANIEL REYES MARTINEZ and others
Sandoval v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2026cv06948
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Walker et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv02660
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Odis Walker and Luz Sandoval Walker
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08869
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Sucely Montoya-Sandoval v. Todd Blanche
as 26-2543
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General
Petitioner:
D.E.M.S., G.M.M.S. and SUCELY RENEE MONTOYA-SANDOVAL
Sandoval Perales v. Freres Lumber Co., Inc. et al
as 6:2026cv02355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sandoval Perales
Defendant:
Freres Lumber Co., Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01545
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
