Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Dunigan v. United States of America, et al.
as 25-7036
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Malone v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Sandy Lee Malone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dunigan v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-6721
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, J. BROWMAN, Dr., SMALLS, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Smith v. Hampton et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Defendant:
Central Paper Company Inc and Eugene Bruce Hampton
Plaintiff:
Sandy Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Summerfield et al v. Tractor Supply Company
as 2:2024cv10091
Plaintiff:
Traci Lynn Summerfield, Brianne Lyn Summerfield, Jeana Marie Bibby and others
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stauring v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Sandi Lee Stauring
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sandy Rowe, et al v. CIR
as 21-71308
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANDY LEE ROWE and SYLVIA MARIE ROWE
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Sandy Rowe, et al v. CIR
as 21-71310
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANDY LEE ROWE and SYLVIA MARIE ROWE
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Pugh, III v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05072
Plaintiff:
Robert Pugh, III
Defendant:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., MERS/Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Liberty Home Equity Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
