Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, "OBSERVER", "Q" and others
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 23-3569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Michael McMahon et al v. The City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09815
Plaintiff:
Michael McMahon, Teresa Batson, Jeannine Bedard and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Eric Garcetti, Karen Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katherine Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Katherine Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al
as 22-17022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Sapon Araus et al v. Fav Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv09756
Plaintiff:
Fredy Sapon Araus, Jordan Sapon Sapon and Wilson Tohom Sapon
Defendant:
Fav Pizza Corp. doing business as Francesco Pizzeria, Margherita Rappa and Vito Rappa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fletcher v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01777
Plaintiff:
Katherine Dee Fletcher
Defendant:
Dreesen, Lindsey, Shift Command and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapon Baquiax v. Garland
as 21-1088
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO CRISTOBAL SAPON BAQUIAX
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz et al v. Atlantic East Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05740
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz, Edgar Cisneros and Henri Mitchellin Sapon
Defendant:
Atlantic East Group, Inc. doing business as Fayrooz Cafe & Hookah Lounge, Sebastian Rosario and Shamima Huq
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
