Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cummings et al v. Murillo et al
as 3:2022cv07481
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lee Cummings, Luciano Rosales, Mariena Acosta and others
Defendant:
Sandra Murillo, City Of San Jose, Vanesssa Beretta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. City of San Jose
as 5:2022cv07186
Plaintiff:
Mark Thompson, Rachelle Imus, Jeffrey P. Echivarov and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose, Sandra Murillo, Vanessa Barretta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Castaneda v. Jack Conway, et al
as 17-35742
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF CASTANEDA, Executor of Estate in GP013531 & GP 013952, James Blume, USMC, AKA Jose Castaneda
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK KENNETH CONWAY, CHASE BANK, LISA MARIE MACCARLEY and others
Estate of Castaneda v. Jack Conway, et al
as 17-35742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF CASTANEDA, Executor of Estate in GP013531 & GP 013952, James Blume, USMC, AKA Jose Castaneda
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK KENNETH CONWAY, CHASE BANK, LISA MARIE MACCARLEY and others
Estate of Castaneda v. Conway et al
as 3:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Estate of Castaneda and James Blume
Defendant:
Jack K. Conway, Chase Bank, Lisa Marie MacCarley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00165
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Keen v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Cheri Keen and Cheri Keen
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Option One Mortgage Corporation, AHMSI Default Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
