Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Maria Morris v. SAS Institute, Inc.
as 19-1664
Defendant / Appellee:
SAS INSTITUTE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA CHANTE MORRIS
SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Limited
as 19-1300
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAS INSTITUTE, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
WORLD PROGRAMMING LIMITED
SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Limited
as 19-1290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAS INSTITUTE, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
WORLD PROGRAMMING LIMITED
Perkoski v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2018cv00542
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of SAS Institute, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DONNA PERKOSKI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Limited et al
as 2:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc., Pizza Hut, Inc., Angoss Software Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Mikael Wahlgren, James E Gates and David Keyzer
Amicus Curiae:
Oracle Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Coding Technologies LLC v. SAS Institute Inc
as 3:2018cv01534
Plaintiff:
Coding Technologies LLC
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Limited
as 2:2017mc00154
Plaintiff:
SAS Institute, Inc.
Defendant:
World Programming Limited
Aurelian IP Management, LLC v. SAS Institute Inc.
as 2:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Aurelian IP Management, LLC
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kelly v. Hospitality Ventures LLC, et al
as 5:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kelly
Defendant:
Hospitality Ventures LLC , SAS Institute Inc. , NC Culinary Ventures LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Limited
as 16-1857
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAS INSTITUTE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
WORLD PROGRAMMING LIMITED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
