Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Conrad Klein et al v. Anthony Pellicano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00799
Plaintiff: Conrad Lee Klein, Jack Reynolds, Christopher Pair and others
Defendant: Anthony Pellicano, Pacific Bell Telephone Company a California corporation doing business as AT and T formerly doing business as SBC Communications Inc, Rayford Earl Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laster, et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2005cv01167
Defendant: Go Wireless, Inc, Cellco Partnership a Delaware Corporation doing business as Verizon Wireless, Pacific Bell Wireless a Nevada Limited Liability Company doing business as Cingular Wireless, . and others
Plaintiff: Vincent Concepcion, Roes, Jennifer L Laster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ca
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Frank Stoffels, et al v. SBC Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-50688
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK STOFFELS, on Behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, LINDA VILLAFANE, on behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and all other persons similarly situated, JAMES BELCHER, on behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN and A T, formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00264
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Withdrawal of Reference
Guthery v. SBC Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv05025
Plaintiff: Charlene Guthery
Defendant: SBC Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 and SBC Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Fields v. SBC Communications, Inc. Disability Income Plan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01022
Plaintiff: Douglas Fields
Defendant: SBC Communications, Inc. Disability Income Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MCAFEE et al v. BELLSOUTH LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES et al
as 5:2011cv00470
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MCAFEE
Defendant: SBC UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO 1, BELLSOUTH LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES and SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1998cv01232
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Movant: ROY A. DAY, CARL LUNDGREN, DAVID L. WHITEHEAD and others
Amicu: PROJECT TO PROMOTE COMPETITION & INNOVATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE
Intervenor: ROBERT E. LITAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United Access Technologies LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00338
Plaintiff: United Access Technologies LLC
Defendant: AT&T Inc., Ameritech Services Inc., AT&T Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Frank Stoffels, et al v. SBC Communications, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-50148
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK STOFFELS, on Behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, JAMES BELCHER, on Behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, BURNIE JOE DUNN, on Behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN and AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?