Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Thomas, Jr. v. Prine et al
as 1:2026cv03325
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jr. James Prine, Margaret Chapura, Everlyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Larry Thomas, Jr. v. James Prine, et al
as 26-11981
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES L. PRINE, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, BRIAN KEMP and others
Charles Brown, Jr. v. Georgia Department of Public Safety, et al
as 23-11096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, R. SCHOFILL and SHIVER
BROWN v. SCHOFILL
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN, JR., R SCHOFILL and Officer SHIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A KING
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, LOUIS SCHOFILL and JOHN TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Georgia Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Public Safety, Officer R. Schofill and Officer Shiver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHOFILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58030
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCHOFILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOLE v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
RON JAMES, Officer ROLLINS, PRESTON ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. SCHOFILL et al
as 7:2019cv00158
Defendant:
COREY SELLERS, LOUIS SCHOFILL, THOMAS COUNTY DRUG SQUAD and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MITCHELL LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF MARY CECILIA SCHOFILED v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv03848
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MARY CECILIA SCHOFILED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
