Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Curtis Abbott, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3636
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Buzbee, Timothy Urtz, Christopher Sovey and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Schrader v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06160
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02198
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schrader, Charles Ballard, Jessica Lawson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Whittle v. Camden County Sheriff's Dept. and Corrections Division et al
as 2:2020cv04060
Defendant:
Garton, Oldrich, Sue Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Ray Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pogany v. US Automotive Protection Services, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Pogany
Defendant:
US Automotive Protection Services, LLC and Brandon Michael Schrader
Schrader et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04462
Plaintiff:
Robert Schrader and Donna Schrader
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mounce et al v. Bayer, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01915
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mounce , Jennifer Checkowski , Sarah Schulz-Arnold and others
Defendant:
Bayer, Inc. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schrader v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2017cv05088
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Michelle Schrader
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schrader-Tracy v. Jasper County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv05025
Plaintiff:
Kandee Elaine Schrader-Tracy
Defendant:
Jasper County Jail and Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
