Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The Washington Post v. David McManus, Jr.
as 19-1132
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Maryland Attorney General, LINDA H. LAMONE, State Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, KELLEY A. HOWELLS, Board Member, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARROLL COUNTY TIMES, LLC, d/b/a Carroll County Times, CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a The Capital, GATEHOUSE MEDIA MARYLAND HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a The Herald-Mail and others
Amicus Curiae:
MPA- THE ASSOCIATION OF MAGAZINE MEDIA, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others
The Washington Post et al v. McManus et al
as 1:2018cv02527
Plaintiff:
The Baltimore Sun Company, LLC, Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Press Association, Inc., Schurz Communications, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Malcolm L. Funn, Board Member Kelley A. Howells, State Administrator Linda H. Lamone and others
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign Legal Center and Common Cause Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYTON et al v. SCHURZ COMMUNICATIONS INC.
as 1:2016cv02134
Defendant:
HOOSIER TIMES INC. and SCHURZ COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Plaintiff:
KATHY L. PARROTT and LISA L. PAYTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Media General Operations, Inc. v. Schurz Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Media General Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Schurz Communications, Inc. , WAGT Television, Inc. and Gray Television Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MEDIA GENERAL, INC., v. SCHURZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al
as 1:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
MEDIA GENERAL, INC.,
Defendant:
SCHURZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC., , WAGT TELEVISION, INC. and GRAY TELEVISION GROUP, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES v. GRAY TELEVISION, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. and SCHURZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
