Cases 21 - 30 of 277
Wood v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11436
Petitioner:
Dale Scott Wood
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scully v. Huggins Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Justin Scully
Defendant:
Huggins Hospital, Scott Orr, PA Christopher Schweiger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv10758
Petitioner:
Timi Y. Wallace
Respondent:
William Scott Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ANTHONEY CANTILLO and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
STRAFFORD COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTION, LEONARD NADEAU, Sergeant, DONNA ROY, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM L. WRENN, MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wedington v. Boncher
as 22-1046
Petitioner / Appellant:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens
JAMES v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN JAMES and MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, GLEN BROWN, SUE CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rego v. Fosko et al
as 1:2021cv11045
Defendant:
Well Path, Barnstable County Jail, Chris Fosko and others
Plaintiff:
Scott F. Rego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cummings et al
as 1:2021cv10124
Defendant:
Montigny, David Cahoon, James M. Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
