Cases 21 - 30 of 7,991
Stewart v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
as 4:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds and Ofc. FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Decicco et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Jessica Lynn Cook, Law Office of Jessica Vicknair L L C, Lauren S Fellers and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Short Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wheelock v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00416
Petitioner:
Scott Ralph Wheelock
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garth v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lady B. Garth
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen, Mississippi, Charles Scott, Monroe County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinones v. Gordon
as 4:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Jose Quinones
Defendant:
Scott Roger Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID **TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN**
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westbrook v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Lula Westbrook
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Kevin Farmer and Scott Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
