Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pierce v. Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Scott Matthew Pierce
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compton v. Compton
as 5:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Tatiana Lisa Compton and Tatiana Lisa Armstrong
Respondent:
Scott Compton
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq. (ICARA) International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Miller El v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller El
Defendant:
Jacqueline F. Talevi, Scott R. Geddes, James R. Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Accordius Health at Lynchburg, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Scott
Defendant:
Accordius Health at Lynchburg, LLC and Accordius Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
