Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Goebel et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Goebel, Michael Goebel and Rebecca Goebel
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Community Health Center of Southeast Kansas doing business as Fort Scott Walk-in Care doing business as Fort Scott Main doing business as Fort Scott Pleasanton, United States of America, Health and Human Services doing business as Community Health Center of Southeast Kansas doing business as Fort Scott Walk-in Care doing business as Fort Scott Main doing business as Fort Scott Pleasanton, Bradley P. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Dmeleo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv03484
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Dmeleo, Raymond Keys, Scott Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dmeleo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv08223
Plaintiff:
Jim Dmeleo, Raymond Keys, Scott Maine and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
MAINS et al v. THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
as 5:2020cv00112
Defendant:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANDREA MAINS and SCOTT MAINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Main v. ARI Fleet, Lt et al
as 6:2010cv00158
Defendant:
ARI Fleet, Lt, Anthony Eichorn and Kellog Sales Company
Plaintiff:
Scott Main
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
United States of America v. Mains
as 1:2009mc10279
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Scott Mains
Central Transport International, Incorporated v. Mains
as 2:2008cv13525
Plaintiff:
Central Transport International, Incorporated
Defendant:
Scott Mains and Lowe's Companies, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
