Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Tilley v. Walton
as 26-5100
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TILLEY
Defendant:
SCOTT WALTON, Sheriff or Rogers County, in his official capacity
In re: E. Palestine Train Derailment
as 26-3499
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ADAMS, ERIC ADKINS, IAN BAKER and others
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Waggoner et al v. Delozier et al
as 4:2026cv00261
Plaintiff:
David Lee Waggoner and Gina Annette Waggoner
Defendant:
Lisa Delozier, Jason Carini, Scott Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waggoner, et al v. Marsh, et al
as 26-5030
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE WAGGONER and GINA ANNETTE WAGGONER
Defendant:
SCOTT MARSH, JASON CARINI, SCOTT WALTON and others
Waggoner et al v. Marsh et al
as 4:2025cv00254
Plaintiff:
David Lee Waggoner and Gina Annette Waggoner
Defendant:
Scott Marsh, Jason Carini, Scott Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tilley v. Walton
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Bradley Tilley
Defendant:
Scott Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Rogers County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00417
Defendant:
Zachary Starkey, Brandon Masingale, Rogers County Board of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Melisha Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leonard v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Walton, K. Jones, Turn Key Health Clinics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18305
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SCOTT WALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
