Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ester Bullock v. Frank Kendall
as 21-2111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTER BULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK KENDALL, Secretary, Department of the Air Force
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 21-55166
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PAUL M. NAKASONE, Department of Defense, National Security Agency, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 20-55688
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PAUL M. NAKASONE, Department of Defense, National Security Agency, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 20-55111
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Robinson v. Donovan
as 19-6150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TREMETRA M. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 19-55926
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, Department of the Navy, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 7703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
