Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant: Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1502
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2598
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Frederick Banks v. Warden FPC Canaan, et al
as 11-2152
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS, an American Indian
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN FPC CANAAN, WARDEN FCC BUTNER, LCSI, WARDEN FCC YAZOO CITY and others
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
In re: Frederick Bank
as 11-1970
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent: US PARDON ATTORNEY, ATTY GEN USA, SECRETARY ARMY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4223
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3600
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ed Sulima v. Tobyhanna Army Depot, et al
as 08-4684
Plaintiff - Appellant: ED SULIMA
Defendant - Appellee: TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT, JOHN MCHUGH, DEFENSE SUPPORT SER, DBA DS2 and others
Defendant - Rule 43 Substitution: FRANCIS J. HARVEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?