Cases 1 - 10 of 517
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv81094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Korte Construction Co. v. Secretary of the Army
as 24-2232
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Appellant:
KORTE CONSTRUCTION CO.
Rawls v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-4646
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
JASON M. RAWLS
Robert White v. EPA
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. WHITE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Timothy Payne v. U.S. Army Material Command (AMC)
as 24-1521
Defendant:
AMC/IMCOM DIRECTOR, JOYCE BALDWIN, AMC/IMCOM (retired services), U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND (AMC), f/k/a Installation Management Command (IMCOM) and others
Plaintiff:
SSGT. TIMOTHY ADAM PAYNE
Walker v. Wormuth
as 24-50448
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Walker
Frederick Banks v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2024cv03779
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, Secretary of the Marines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gardenia Dorado-Ocasio v. Christine Wormuth
as 24-1360
Plaintiff:
GARDENIA M. DORADO-OCASIO
Defendant:
CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army
Michael Baxley v. Christine Wormuth, et al
as 24-5104
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Baxley
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army and Army Board for Correction of Military Records
Andrew Dudt v. Christine Wormuth
as 24-5084
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dudt, Major, U.S. Army
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, The Honorable, Secretary of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.