Cases 21 - 30 of 35,089
Arble v. Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Arble
Defendant:
Dominion Energy Services, Inc. doing business as Dominion Energy Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gritton v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Peter "Todd" Gritton
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lynn Detillion v. OH Dept of Rehabilitation and Corr, et al
as 24-3347
Plaintiff:
LYNN EVELYN DETILLION
Defendant:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and OHIO CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME LOCAL 11, AFL-CIO
Tenley Good v. BioLife Plasma Services, L.P., et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
TENLEY MCLAUGHLIN GOOD
Defendant:
BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. and SHIRE US, INC., aka Shire Pharmaceuticals
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Waller v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Thelbert Waller
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC, Youmian and Furgle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
