Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv03354
Plaintiff:
Robert Pearson
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, C.O. Murphy, C.O. Lt. Campball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Davis, Jr. v. Tracy Shafer
as 24-1260
Plaintiff:
RICKY ANTONIO DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
TRACY SHAFER, Mental Health Psychiatric Prescriber, Wellpath, et al.
Bey v. Ionia County Court et al
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Malik Bey
Respondent:
Ionia County Court, Kyle Brandon Butler, Ronald J. Shafer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braden Shafer v. United States
as 24-1450
Petitioner:
Braden Craig Shafer
Respondent:
United States of America
Stiff-Brown #587330 v. Shafer et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Duane Stiff-Brown #587330
Defendant:
Unknown Shafer, Unknown Leonhardt, Unknown Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis #369621 v. Shafer
as 1:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Ricky Antonio Davis #369621, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett and Ty
Defendant:
Robert May, Shafer, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
