Cases 11 - 20 of 61
WRIGHT v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMA JONES, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE
Defendant:
SAMMIE JOSEPH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), R. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
NIGEL TRICE JOYNER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER, SCOTT FITCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02466
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGLE, BOB BUGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER et al v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02450
Plaintiff:
NIGEL TRICE JOYNER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER, SCOTT FITCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. UNIDENTIFIED MAILROOM EMPLOYEES (DAVIDSON) et al
as 1:2022cv02071
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED MAILROOM EMPLOYEES (DAVIDSON), KENNEDY, C. SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle v. Nelson et al
as 6:2022cv01361
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyle
Defendant:
Shane L. Nelson, Michael Hudson, Jason James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. NELSON
as 1:2022cv01332
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
SHANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Moore v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Moore
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Oregon Dept of Corrections, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
