Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BROWN v. 1199J UNION et al
as 2:2023cv04452
Plaintiff:
SHARRON BROWN
Defendant:
1199J UNION and H.R. DEPT ST. MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184 Violation Collection Bargain Agreement
Lance Benson v. John Dowbak, et al
as 22-16549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ALYN BENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOWBAK, Orthopedic Surgeon, SURESH HOSURU, Primary Care Physician and GALEN H. CHURCH, CP&S; CHCF
Defendant / Appellant:
SHARRON BROWN, Psychiatric Technician
(PC) Benson v. Dowbak et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Plaintiff:
Lance Alyn Benson
Defendant:
John Dowbak, Sharron Brown, Suresh Hosuru and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. K. Mackey
as 17-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
BAILEY v. MACKEY et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
K. D. MACKEY, C.C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
