Cases 1 - 10 of 335
SHAW v. MARKS et al
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
ARIES SHAW
Defendant:
AARON M. MARKS, JOEY D BRANT, CORPORAL MARIACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SHAW v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCCANN v. CHERNISKY et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CHERNISKY, WARDEN SMITH, CAPTAIN WOLFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
JADEN SHAW
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE EMPLOYEES, CLYDE BRANSON, JOHN LANKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Murray v. Shaw et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Murray
Defendant:
Debbie Shaw, Joscelyn Funnie, Lisa Rein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
