Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Ocampo, et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Defendant:
WALTER OCAMPO, EMILY CLAIRE OCAMPO, TIMOTHY SHAWN DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Beck et al v. West End Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Beck, Jeff Cantrell, Jeffery Clark and others
Defendant:
West End Construction, LLC and Chris Sutton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07006
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DIXON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, MARIO DEBARROS, ALPHADEL MCKEE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20854
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SHAWN DIXON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shawn Dixon v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 20-3102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Shawn Dixon v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 20-2572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
DIXON v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2019cv05555
Petitioner:
SHAWN DIXON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY KRASNER, KATHY BRITTIAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Shawn Dixon
as 17-10503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN DIXON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
