Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
American Neighborhood Mortgage Acceptance Co LLC v. CrossCountry Mortgage Inc, et al
as 22-3360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CO LLC, DBA Anniemac Home Mortgage
Defendant:
CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE INC
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN MILLER, TODD BAILEY and STEVEN LOBUE
American Neighborhood Mortgage v. CrossCountry Mortgage Inc, et al
as 20-3324
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN MILLER, STEVEN LOBUE, CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CO LLC, DBA Anniemac Home Mortgage
MILLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv16302
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
H. SHAWN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC v. CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00874
Defendant:
CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, INC., TODD BAILEY, STEVEN LO BUE and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. UMDNJ et al
as 2:2012cv04045
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MILLER
Defendant:
UMDNJ, NURSE JAMES and PAUL LAGANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Miller v. Corey Harcha, et al
as 12-2574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY HARCHA, LEE MYERS and JORDAN SEESE
MILLER v. HARCHA et al
as 2:2009cv01642
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MILLER
Defendant:
COREY HARCHA, LEE MYERS and JORDAN SEESE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
