Cases 11 - 20 of 82
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17339
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA SMITH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sheila Smith v. Hollywood
as 23-3044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheila Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Hollywood
Smith v. Hollywood
as 4:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Hollywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15349
Plaintiff:
SHEILA SMITH
Counter Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC, KENVUE, INC. and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sheila Smith v. Gail Jones, et al
as 23-2894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheila Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Gail R. Jones, Dr. and Tommy Wenseleck
Smith v. Amosi Alltel
as 4:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Amosi Alltel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Diocese of Russia
as 4:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Diocese of Russia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sheila Smith v. Diocese of Russia
as 23-2963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheila Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Diocese of Russia
Sheila Smith v. Johnson Johnson
as 23-3045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheila Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Johnson Johnson
Jackson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11605
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith Jackson
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
