Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE GODWIN
Defendant:
D. HOLMES, EDWARDS and SIS STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryant v. Unit Staff et al
as 1:2016cv04459
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bryant
Defendant:
Unit Staff, SIS Staff at FCI Terre Haute and Unit Team Staff at FCC Forrest City Medium
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 13-6262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD LEE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, TERRY O'BRIEN, UNKNOWN JOHN DOE ASSOCIATE WARDENS and others
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN, from 8/5/10 to 10/12/10, SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT LIEUTENANTS, from 6/3/10 to 10/12/10, SJS STAFF, through 6/3/10 to 10/12/10 and others
Edward Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 12-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD LEE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, TERRY O'BRIEN, UNKNOWN JOHN DOE ASSOCIATE WARDENS and others
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN, from 8/5/10 to 10/12/10, SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT LIEUTENANTS, from 6/3/10 to 10/12/10, SJS STAFF, through 6/3/10 to 10/12/10 and others
Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Terry O'Brien, Unknown John Doe Associate Wardens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Walker v. Federal Correctional Inst.
as 09-7967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LAMONT WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - PETERSBURG, (Medium) Federal Employees, Lieutenant working May 15, 2007, at 7 p.m., and June 5, 2007 at 7 p.m. who placed me in administrative detention; E-North unit manager November 2006 thru June, 2007, SIS staff work
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
