Cases 1 - 10 of 41
STANLEY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2026cv00319
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GAMAR STANLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King Cooper, III v. Chatham County Detention Center, et al
as 25-14268
Plaintiff:
KING DAVID COOPER, III
Defendant:
CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SHERIFF, CHATHAM COUNTY, O'REILY and others
Siska v. Bisignano
as 0:2025cv04454
Plaintiff:
Lucas Siska
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Xavier Howard v. Cesar Siska
as 25-10927
Plaintiff:
XAVIER HOWARD
Defendant:
DOCTOR CESAR SISKA, Physician at Riverbend Correctional Facility
Feliciano v. Siska et al
as 4:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Filiberto Feliciano
Defendant:
LPN S. Harn and Dr. Siska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siska v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03735
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Thomas Siska
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GOODEN v. PHAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00301
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, WARDEN PHAMS, CECIL SISKA and others
Plaintiff:
JIMMY GOODEN, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PARHAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MANDRELL PARHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN and CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN, CESAR SISKA and DOCTOR CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISKA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22383
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SISKA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
