Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Xiao v. SLM Corporation
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Changchang Xiao
Defendant:
SLM Corporation doing business as Sallie Mae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wang v. SLM Corporation
as 1:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Yumeng Wang
Defendant:
SLM Corporation doing business as Sallie Mae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gordon v. Quinlan et al
as 3:2016cv00867
Defendant:
CollectCorp, Inc., Federal Student Aid, Raymond J. Quinlan and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schulenburg, Timothy v. Sallie Mae (SLM Corporation)
as 3:2014cv00774
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Schulenburg
Defendant:
Sallie Mae (SLM Corporation)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mark Arthur, et al v. SLM Corporation, et al
as 12-35860
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK A ARTHUR, CIRILO MARTINEZ, PARI NAJAFI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
SARA SIBLEY and JUDITH BROWN
Defendant:
SLM CORPORATION, DBA Sallie Mae
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLIE MAE INC and ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Arthur v. SLM Corporation
as 2:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
Mark A Arthur, Mark A Arthur, Mark A Arthur and others
Defendant:
SLM Corporation, SLM Corporation and SLM Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
