Cases 21 - 30 of 140
SLOAN v. OKAFOR et al
as 1:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY SLOAN
Defendant:
CHRISTABEL OKAFOR, WESTWAYS STAFFING SERVICE, IDOC PLAINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chairs v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Amos Chairs
Defendant:
Mr. Daniels, Sloan and Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Stark County, Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01258
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gutierrez
Defendant:
Stark County, Illinois, Steve Sloan, Keith R Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sloan v. USA
as 4:2021cv04115
Petitioner:
Levi J Sloan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Sloan et al
as 1:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Sterling C Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Valerie J Wagher, Steve Sloan, Stark County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAX et al v. SLOAN et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant:
NATHAN SLOAN, MELISSA PEASE, DENNIS MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE S. LAX and CRYSTAL LAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. MUNCIE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv02044
Defendant:
NATHAN SLOAN, MUNCIE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIELLE BRADFORD and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2020cv04158
Defendant:
. Hanna, Melissa Shaw, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Merritte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00548
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Medical Corporation, Officer Sloan and others
Plaintiff:
Trent Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloane et al v. Byline Bank, as successor by merger to First Bank & Trust et al
as 1:2020cv03003
Defendant:
Byline Bank, as successor by merger to First Bank & Trust and Randall & Kenig LLP
Plaintiff:
Sanford E. Sloane and Paulette Herbstman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
