Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Slocum v. Wickham Park Trust
as 3:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Pamela Slocum
Defendant:
Wickham Park Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Slocum v. Averitt Express, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02789
Plaintiff:
Ted Slocum
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Slocum v. Taylor et al
as 2:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Slocum
Defendant:
Marc Taylor and Marc Taylor Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Slocum v. WorkFit Medical, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv06186
Defendant:
WorkFit Medical, LLC, C. Jay Ellie, Jr., M.D. and Brian Banas
Plaintiff:
Tracy Slocum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical Group
as 13-3767
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Rudolph A. Buckley, M.D.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Slocum Dickson Medical Group, PLLC, as successor in interest to Slocum Dickson Medical Group, P.C.
Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical Group
as 13-3536
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Rudolph A. Buckley, M.D.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Slocum Dickson Medical Group, PLLC, as successor in interest to Slocum Dickson Medical Group, P.C.
Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical Group
as 13-3535
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Rudolph A. Buckley, M.D.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Slocum Dickson Medical Group, PLLC, as successor in interest to Slocum Dickson Medical Group, P.C.
Peter Irrgang et al v. Scott Dolezal et al
as 2:2012cv10359
Defendant:
Does, Scott Dolezal, Sean Gowrie and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Irrgang, Greg Kidman, Russell B Nielsen and others
Mary Slocum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv06195
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Slocum
Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical Group, PLLC
as 6:2010cv00974
Plaintiff:
Rudolph A. Buckley
Defendant:
Slocum Dickson Medical Group, PLLC
Counter_claimant:
Slocum Dickson Medical Group, PLLC
Counter_defendant:
Rudolph A. Buckley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
