Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Norwood v. Czerniak et al
as 1:2020cv07773
Defendant:
Posmani, Wexford Health Soures Inc., Ron Hain and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONSTANT v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2020cv05617
Defendant:
CALVIN LEAVEN CRUM, MASTERS, CHOPP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONSTANT v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2020cv05389
Defendant:
BURACH, MASTERS, BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon v. Korte et al
as 3:2019cv03228
Defendant:
Stephen Bradshaw, Jeffrey Korte, Ryan Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sours et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, John Ashcroft, Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene V. LaMartina and William Scott Sours
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coonrod #177732 v. Sherman et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
William Coonrod #177732
Defendant:
Unknown Sherman, Unknown Pratt, Unknown Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sours v. Karr et al
as 3:2015cv05075
Plaintiff:
William Scott Sours
Defendant:
Chad Karr, Tommy Kitch, J Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Sours v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 13-17389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM SCOTT SOURS
Defendant - Appellant:
HARRELL WATTS, Administrator Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his personal and professional capacity and ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Western Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his personal and professional capacity
Washington v. Illinois Dept. of Corr. et al
as 1:2013cv05977
Plaintiff:
Marcus Washington
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corr., Wexford Health Soures, M. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sours v. Arnott et al
as 6:2012cv03397
Petitioner:
William Scott Sours
Respondent:
James Arnott and U.S. Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
