Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
Ruby Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs d/b/a Coastla Center-Highlands 510, South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs d/b/a Coastal Center-Highlands Hillside, Freddie Lee Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timpson et al v. Haley et al
as 6:2016cv01174
Plaintiff:
Johnny Timpson and Sandra Timpson
Defendant:
Nikki Haley , Anderson County Disabilities and Special Needs Board, The , Horace Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 15-1026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 15-1022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 15-1024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 14-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 14-1428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 14-1429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Firmender v. Rotholz et al
as 2:2011cv02168
Plaintiff:
Gary Firmender
Defendant:
David Rotholz, Beverly Buscemi, Kathi Lacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 10-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
SANDRA RAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
