Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Corvin Young v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility
as 23-7077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORVIN J. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, SPARTANBURG COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, County Sheriff and others
David Sullivan v. Jennifer Well
as 10-7676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FARRELL SULLIVAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER WELLS, Assistant County Solicitor, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, LARRY POWERS and others
David Sullivan v. Jennifer Well
as 10-6859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FARRELL SULLIVAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER WELLS, Assistant County Solicitor, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, LARRY POWERS and others
DS Simmons Inc v. Walbridge Southern LLC et al
as 7:2009cv03031
Plaintiff:
DS Simmons Inc
Defendant:
Walbridge Southern LLC, Spartanburg County South Carolina, South Carolina State Ports Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Sullivan v. Wells et al
as 6:2009cv02551
Plaintiff:
David Farrell Sullivan
Defendant:
Jennifer Wells and Political Subdivision of Spartanburg County South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Charles Penland, Sr. v. The Honorable Judge Couch
as 08-8495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W. PENLAND, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HONORABLE JUDGE COUCH, LARRY W. PROPES, Clerk of Court Columbia, KENNETH REINSTAFF, Clerk of Court Spartanburg County South Carolina and others
Charles Penland, Sr. v. County of Spartanburg
as 08-1925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W. PENLAND, SR. and MARY PENLAND, Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG, South Carolina, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JERRY SAAD, Court Appointed Receiver and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
