Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. v. W. Kenneth Paxton et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
Defendant:
W. Kenneth Paxton and Jane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Spirit AeroSystems Inc
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Arthur Barnes
Defendant:
Spirit AeroSystems Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems
as 23-3136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY A. LAWSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Li et al v. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03722
Plaintiff:
Hang Li and Mark J. Suchinski
Defendant:
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. and Tom Gentile III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meitav Dash Provident Funds and Pension Ltd., et al v. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, et al
as 22-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEITAV DASH PROVIDENT FUNDS AND PENSION LTD., GARY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CITY OF MIAMI FIRE FIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT TRUST
Plaintiff:
JACOB GOLDMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., THOMAS C. GENTILE, III, JOSE GARCIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems
as 21-3219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY A. LAWSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC.
Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems
as 21-3213
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. LAWSON
Defendant / Appellant:
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
