Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Spurlock v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02240
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Spurlock
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spurlock et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02572
Plaintiff:
Julia Spurlock and Kenneth Spurlock
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spurlock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00499
Plaintiff:
Robin Ann Spurlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Spurlock et al
as 7:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Linda Spurlock, Linda Spurlock Unknown Spouse of and Danny Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv10523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruse v. Blevins et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Wendell Cruse
Defendant:
Alfred Belvins, John Doe, Eric Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DePinto v. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga et al
as 1:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Frank DePinto
Defendant:
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Interim Chancellor Grady Bogue, Vice-Chancellor Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Spurlock Mining Co., Inc., et al v. Kenneth Wells, et al
as 13-3407
Petitioner:
SPURLOCK MINING CO., INC. and AMERICAN BUSINESS & MERCANTILE INSURANCE MUTUAL, INC.
Respondent:
KENNETH P. WELLS and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
